• 关键词：温室气体排放  城市生活垃圾  IPCC  生命周期评价  填埋  焚烧  气化

• 基金项目：“十一五”国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2008BAC46B06)

• 赵磊
• 同济大学热能与环境工程研究所, 上海 200092

• 陈德珍
• 同济大学热能与环境工程研究所, 上海 200092

• 刘光宇
• 同济大学热能与环境工程研究所, 上海 200092

• 栾健
• 同济大学热能与环境工程研究所, 上海 200092

• ThomasH.Christensen
• 丹麦技术大学环境学院, 丹麦

• 摘要：为了明确城市生活垃圾焚烧和热解两种热化学方式处理过程中温室气体的排放量(简称"碳排放"或GHG),分别采用生命周期评价方法(LCA)和政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)制定的2006国家温室气体排放清单指南(简称"IPCC2006指南")进行了核算,并计算了两种垃圾热化学处理方式相对于填埋处理的GHG减排量.结果表明,两种核算方法计算所得的不同垃圾处理方式的碳排放趋势基本一致,但基于IPCC2006指南计算出的GHG减排量高于LCA方法的计算结果.相对填埋处理而言,焚烧处理的GHG减排量从LCA法的597～660kg(以CO₂当量计,下同)提高到IPCC2006指南法的648～747kg;垃圾热解发电的GHG减排量从LCA法的535kg提高到IPCC2006指南法的589kg.同时,对这两种核算方法的特点及在我国的适用性进行了分析,研究认为LCA法和IPCC2006指南可以结合使用以促进我国GHG核算机制的完善.

• Abstract：Different greenhouse gas(GHG)accounting methods may lead to different outcomes.In this work life-cycle assessment(LCA)and IPCC2006 guidelines were applied to calculate GHGemissions from a municipal solid waste(MSW)landfill and two MSWthermo-chemical conversion processes:incineration and pyrolysis.Similar trends were found for the results from the two accounting methods,which show that both incineration and pyrolysis are more environmentally favorable than landfilling without landfill gas collection.Under LCAestimation,incineration and pyrolysis lead to 597～660 kg CO₂-eq and 535 kg CO₂-eq GHGsavings,respectively;while calculated by the IPCC2006 guidelines,incineration and pyrolysis lead to 648～747 kg CO₂-eq and 589 kg CO₂-eq GHGsavings respectively.This increase related to the IPCC2006 guidelines was analysed based on the calculation mechanism and the adaptabilities of both accounting methods in China were evaluated and compared.Joint use of IPCC2006 Guidelines and LCAmethod in different cases is recommended for improvement of the accounting method and provision of default data for new technology such as pyrolysis.

• Key words：greenhouse gas  municipal solid waste(MSW)  IPCC  life cycle assessment  landfill  incineration  gasification

• 
  摘要点击次数： 3342 全文下载次数： 3432