特别选题:纪念环境保护部华南环境科学研究所建所40周年
张智胜,陶俊,谢绍东,周来东,宋丹林,张普,曹军骥,罗磊.成都城区PM2.5季节污染特征及来源解析[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(11):2947-2952
成都城区PM2.5季节污染特征及来源解析
- Seasonal variations and source apportionment of PM2.5 at urban area of Chengdu
- 基金项目：国家环境保护公益性行业科研专项(No.201009001);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(No.PM-ZX021-201211-104)
- 作者
- 单位
- 张智胜
- 环境保护部华南环境科学研究所, 广州 510655
- 陶俊
- 环境保护部华南环境科学研究所, 广州 510655
- 谢绍东
- 北京大学环境科学与工程学院, 北京 100871
- 周来东
- 成都市环境保护科学研究院, 成都 610072
- 宋丹林
- 成都市环境保护科学研究院, 成都 610072
- 张普
- 成都市环境保护科学研究院, 成都 610072
- 曹军骥
- 中国科学院地球环境研究所, 西安 710075
- 罗磊
- 中国气象局成都高原气象研究所, 成都 610071
- 摘要：于2009—2010年各季节典型月在成都城区采集了大气PM2.5样品,对PM2.5的质量浓度及其主要化学成分(含碳组分、水溶性无机离子和元素)进行了测定. 结果显示:成都城区PM2.5平均质量浓度高达(165.1±85.1)μg·m-3,是国家环境空气质量标准年均PM2.5限值的4.7倍. OC、EC和水溶性二次离子(SO42-,NO3-和NH4+)的平均浓度分别为(22.6±10.2)μg·m-3,(9.0±5.4)μg·m-3和(62.8±44.3)μg·m-3,分别占PM2.5浓度的13.7%、5.5%和38.0%. PM2.5及其主要化学成分浓度季节特征明显,即秋冬季高于春夏季. 利用正交矩阵因子分析(PMF)对成都城区PM2.5的来源进行解析,结果表明,土壤尘及扬尘、生物质燃烧、机动车源和二次硝酸盐/硫酸盐的贡献率分别为14.3%、28.0%、24.0%和31.3%. 就季节变化而言,生物质燃烧源贡献率在四个季节均维持在较高水平;土壤尘及扬尘的贡献率在春季显著提高;机动车源的贡献率在夏季中表现突出;而二次硝酸盐/硫酸盐的贡献率在秋冬季中则最为显著.
- Abstract：Daily PM2.5 samples were collected from 2009 to 2010 during a typical month of each season at an urban site of Chengdu. The mass concentration and chemical compositions (including carbonaceous species, water-soluble inorganic ions and elements) of PM2.5 were determined. The results showed that the average PM2.5 mass concentration was (165.1±85.1) μg·m-3, which was 4.7 times the annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard of China. The average concentrations of OC, EC and total secondary inorganic ions (SO42-, NO3- and NH4+) were (22.6±10.2) μg·m-3, (9.0±5.4) μg·m-3 and (62.8±44.3) μg·m-3, accounting for 13.7%, 5.5% and 38.0% of PM2.5 mass concentration, respectively. Higher levels of PM2.5 mass concentration and their major chemical compositions were found in autumn and winter compared to those found in spring and summer. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model was performed to identify the sources of PM2.5 at urban Chengdu. Four sources significantly contributing to the observed PM2.5 were: soil dust and fugitive dust, biomass burning, vehicle emissions and secondary nitrate/sulfate, with the contributions of 14.3%, 28.0%, 24.0% and 31.3% to PM2.5 mass concentration, respectively. These four sources exhibited distinct seasonal patterns: the relative contribution of biomass burning to total PM2.5 was relatively high for all seasons;the relative contribution of soil dust and fugitive dust increased significantly during spring;vehicle emissions contributed significantly during summer;and the highest relative contribution to PM2.5 during autumn and winter was secondary nitrate/sulfate factor.
摘要点击次数： 3231 全文下载次数： 5888
