研究报告

  • 何琴,李蕾,赵小飞,伍迪,瞿莉,彭绪亚.R-PFR与CSTR厌氧消化餐厨垃圾运行效率及微生物群落结构对比[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(2):587-598

  • R-PFR与CSTR厌氧消化餐厨垃圾运行效率及微生物群落结构对比
  • Comparison of R-PFR and CSTR performance and microbial community structure during anaerobic digestion of food waste
  • 基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费项目(No.106112017CDJXY210006)
  • 作者
  • 单位
  • 何琴
  • 重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045
  • 李蕾
  • 重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045
  • 赵小飞
  • 重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045
  • 伍迪
  • 重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045
  • 瞿莉
  • 重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045
  • 彭绪亚
  • 重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400045
  • 摘要:以中温餐厨垃圾(FW)厌氧消化反应器为研究对象,结合稳定运行过程中的微生物群落结构特征,考察了两种常见的厌氧消化反应器-完全混合式反应器(CSTR)和有回流的推流式反应器(R-PFR)的运行效率和稳定性.结果表明,两种构型的反应器均能在3.0 kg·m-3·d-1(以VS计)负荷下稳定高效地运行.R-PFR具有更稳定的稳定性指数,如总碱度(TA)和挥发性脂肪酸比TA值(VFA/TA),以及更低的氨氮(TAN)和游离氨(FAN)浓度,但产气效率(如比甲烷产率(SMP))不及CSTR.R-PFR中以Chloroflexi门(37.35%)和Firmicutes门(31.22%)为优势细菌,而CSTR中以Bacteroidetes门(31.14%)与Firmicutes门(44.41%)为优势细菌.CSTR和R-PFR均以Methanosaeta属为优势产甲烷菌(98.72%和84.90%),乙酸型产甲烷途径为主要的产甲烷途径.但CSTR中除Methanosaeta属以外还有一定丰度的混合营养型的Methanosarcina,以及氢营养型MethanospirillumMethanolinea.CSTR中具有对VFA和TAN更具耐受性的产甲烷菌群,更有利于餐厨垃圾产甲烷过程的稳定进行.由于R-PFR的敏感性较低,有利于处理剧烈变化的底物,但R-PFR容易出现严重的局部酸化现象,不利于长期处理过高负荷的易降解底物(如餐厨垃圾).这些结果可为优化餐厨垃圾厌氧消化工艺设计提供基础依据.
  • Abstract:To identify the most efficient system for conversion of food waste (FW) into biogas, FW fermentation was investigated in two types of reactors:a completely-stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and a plug-flow reactor with a reflux ratio (R-PFR). The efficiency, stability, and microbial community structure in the reactors were compared. Stable fermentation was achieved under an organic loading rate (OLR) of 3.0 kgVS·m-3·d-1 in both reactors. Compared with the CSTR, total alkalinity (TA) and ratio of volatile fatty acids (VFA) to TA (VFA/TA) were more stable, and inhibitors such as total ammonia-nitrogen (TAN) and free ammonia-nitrogen (FAN) concentrations were lower in R-PFR. However, specific methane production (SMP) was higher in the CSTR. The phyla Chloroflexi (37.35%) and Firmicutes (31.22%) were predominant in the R-PFR, whereas Firmicutes (44.41%) and Bacteroidetes (31.14%) were more abundant in the CSTR. The genus Methanosaeta accounted for 98.72% and 84.90% of the total population in the CSTR and R-PFR, respectively, indicating that the main methanogenic pathway in both reactors was acetoclastic methanogenesis. In addition to Methanosaeta, mixotrophic methanogens such as Methanosarcina (9.72%) and hydrogenotrophic methanogens such as Methanospirillum and Methanolinea were detected in the CSTR. The methanogenic community obtained in the CSTR had a greater tolerance to high ammonia and VFA levels, which is conducive to stable and efficient methanogenesis. R-PFR may be more appropriate for highly variable substrate, as shock loads can vary spatially in the reactor. However, R-PFR systems are not suitable for long-term treatment of highly degradable substrate such as FW, as local acidification may occur. Our results provide a basis for the optimization of anaerobic FW digestion.

  • 摘要点击次数: 1123 全文下载次数: 2431